Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited to’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A word to the wise: take advantage of the perks, the advice, and discover the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you are a certain loser.
We submit to many generic outcomes: not just testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests within our choice of a beneficial, spiritual, safe place, or even to the denial of supernatural existence. Here,’chance’depends upon whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we could evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We just have to uncover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If you can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, you can wonder at the advantage or outcome in discipline assurances. An interest shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, and other unspecific language is no easy topic to decipher, nevertheless, the dilemma isn’t impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to work: first, we know they are computers programmed to come back a certain profit to the Casino; second, Areadomino we know they should have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the home; third, we know some machines are set to pay for a smaller return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by way of a losing cycle. Learn to identify the symptoms. Some players typically leave the Casino a winner. Allow yourself to quit a winner.
Back to the other chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in your head;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one doesn’t know the chronological schedule, he then is susceptible to much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to famous brands Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, involving the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “available” in the Last Age, and was arriving at a close in A.D. 68.
Therefore, in view of the factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, in view of the conclusions, one still really wants to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what group of rules or inescapable facts will he select as a bonus in these greatly contested gambles? You cannot lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions available these days and resulting from fifteen years of arduous research.